赵俊杰：缓解“稀土焦虑”，欧盟先放下面子

Group 1 - The recent focus on rare earth issues in Europe reflects strategic anxiety among European leaders, highlighting their dependency on rare earth materials and the lack of control over critical resources [1][2] - European countries, particularly Germany, France, and Poland, are considering retaliatory measures against China, including increased tariffs and investment reviews, indicating a deepening conflict over rare earth resources [1] - The EU's overemphasis on rare earths illustrates a broader issue of strategic vulnerability, as European nations have historically outsourced resource-intensive industries to developing countries, creating a significant shortfall in their own capabilities [1][2] Group 2 - The concepts of "European normative power" and "Brussels Effect" demonstrate how the EU leverages soft power to enhance its global influence by setting regulations and standards that other countries often adopt [2] - The EU is contemplating using legislative tools like the "Anti-Coercion Instrument" and the "EU Market Prohibition of Products Made with Forced Labor" to pressure China regarding rare earths, raising concerns about the politicization of the issue [2] - The EU's contradictory stance of wanting to curb China while simultaneously needing cooperation on rare earths reflects a complex and challenging policy landscape [3][4] Group 3 - The "America First" trade protectionism has adversely affected European exports, exacerbating the region's economic recovery challenges amid geopolitical conflicts and supply chain shortages [4] - The EU should prioritize economic transformation and structural reform rather than adopting a confrontational approach towards China, as this could undermine the foundation of EU-China relations and miss opportunities for cooperation [4] - The current situation calls for a rational approach to EU-China bilateral relations, especially in light of the urgent need for rare earth supplies in Europe [4]