拿糖当钱找零?开店怎能既不大方又不严谨

Core Viewpoint - The incident involving a store using candy as change has sparked significant public discussion, highlighting a breach of consumer rights and market transaction norms [1][2][3] Group 1: Consumer Rights and Business Practices - The company stated that it does not support the practice of using candy as change, but some stores may ask customers for consent in cases of insufficient change [1] - According to consumer protection laws, consumers have the right to fair trading conditions, including quality assurance and correct pricing, and can refuse forced transactions [1][2] - The practice of using candy instead of cash violates consumer rights, including the right to be informed and the right to choose, and can be seen as a form of forced trading [3] Group 2: Market Transaction Norms - In standard market practices, businesses typically offer discounts or promotions to attract consumers, but charging extra or using alternative forms of payment without consent is unacceptable [2] - The act of substituting candy for cash change is viewed as a serious violation of market transaction rules, as consumers did not purchase the candy and should not be required to pay for it [2][3] - The accumulation of such practices can lead to significant profits for businesses while undermining consumer rights, indicating a lack of respect for consumers [3]