全国首例应用专业损失核定模型债券虚假陈述纠纷案今宣判

Core Viewpoint - The Shanghai Financial Court has publicly ruled on a case involving a rural commercial bank and several other parties regarding false statements in the interbank bond market, marking a significant development in the judicial practice of bond-related disputes in China [1] Group 1: Case Details - The case involves a rural commercial bank as the plaintiff and multiple defendants, including another bank, a financial company, a law firm, an accounting firm, a credit rating agency, a trust company, and a third-party credit company [1] - This case is notable for being the first in China to introduce third-party professional institutions in bond false statement liability disputes [1] Group 2: Legal Innovations - The court explored the application of the "bond value comparison method" and related models to reasonably deduct losses caused by non-false statement behaviors [1]