Workflow
第三方企业出资改造运营,广州老旧小区改造新模式能否复制
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao·2025-10-29 07:13

Core Insights - The article discusses the innovative approach to the renovation of old residential communities in Guangzhou, particularly highlighting the Huangshi Garden project, which involves third-party enterprises collaborating with the government for funding and operational management [2][8][12] Group 1: Renovation Models - Various renovation models have been observed in Guangzhou, including owner-funded projects and government-funded initiatives, but the Huangshi Garden project stands out due to the involvement of a third-party enterprise, Vision Group, which operates under an EPCO (Engineering, Procurement, Construction, and Operation) model [2][8] - The Huangshi Garden project is the first of its kind in Guangzhou, where a non-owner third-party enterprise collaborates with the government to manage the renovation process [2][8] Group 2: Community Characteristics - Huangshi Garden community has a complex demographic, consisting of public rental housing, employee welfare housing, and commercial housing, which complicates community management [7][8] - The community's diverse resident backgrounds lead to significant coordination challenges, making it difficult to gather funding from residents for renovations [8][10] Group 3: Financial Aspects - The government contributed over 20 million yuan for public space renovations, while Vision Group invested over 10 million yuan for the renovation and operation of idle public housing [8][10] - The project has shown promising financial results, with a rental rate of 91% for the renovated public housing, indicating effective utilization of resources [10][12] Group 4: Future Implications - Following the success of the Huangshi Garden model, Guangzhou plans to replicate this third-party EPCO model in other old residential communities, which may include various other neighborhoods [14] - The "public housing conversion model" is identified as a sustainable approach for financing the renovation of old communities by leveraging idle public housing resources [12][14]