The Stock Market Is Getting Dangerously Close to Becoming the Most Expensive It's Ever Been (Dating Back to 1871) -- and History Points to Trouble Ahead
Yahoo Finance·2025-11-01 07:06

Core Insights - The article discusses the limitations of the traditional price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio and introduces the Shiller P/E ratio as a more reliable valuation tool during economic fluctuations [1][6][11] - It highlights the current high levels of the Shiller P/E ratio, indicating potential overvaluation in the stock market, particularly in the context of historical data [8][9][10] Valuation Tools - The traditional P/E ratio is calculated by dividing a company's share price by its trailing-12-month earnings per share (EPS), with lower values typically indicating better value [2] - The Shiller P/E ratio, or cyclically adjusted P/E ratio, uses average inflation-adjusted EPS over the previous 10 years, making it less susceptible to short-term economic shocks [6][7] Market Performance - The S&P 500, Dow Jones Industrial Average, and Nasdaq Composite have reached record highs in 2025, reflecting a strong market performance despite previous volatility [5][6] - The current Shiller P/E ratio for the S&P 500 has reached 41.20, the highest in the current bull market cycle, raising concerns about sustainability [8][9] Historical Context - Historically, the highest Shiller P/E ratio was 44.19 in December 1999, just before the dot-com bubble burst, suggesting that current levels may indicate a similar risk [9][10] - There have been only six instances since 1871 where the Shiller P/E exceeded 30 for at least two months during a bull market, all of which were followed by significant market drawdowns [10] Long-term Investment Perspective - Historical data shows that despite short-term market corrections, long-term investors have consistently seen positive returns over rolling 20-year periods [15][17] - The article emphasizes the importance of patience and optimism in investing, suggesting that staying the course can lead to substantial gains over time [14][18]