美国“停止推翻他国政权”？多方不信

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. intelligence director, Avril Haines, stated that the previous strategy of supporting regime change or nation-building in other countries has ended, acknowledging that such actions often backfire and waste taxpayer resources [1][3]. Summary by Sections U.S. Foreign Policy Shift - Haines emphasized that U.S. foreign policy has been trapped in a cycle of counterproductive actions, either pushing for regime change or nation-building, which has resulted in more enemies than allies and has cost trillions of dollars [3][4]. - The current U.S. administration is facing criticism for its contradictory foreign policy, as it publicly opposes regime change while still engaging in actions reminiscent of past interventionist strategies [4][5]. New Interventionism - Analysts describe the current U.S. approach as a "new interventionism," where despite cutting back on democracy support, the administration still intervenes in other nations' internal affairs, influencing economic policies and political processes [6][7]. - Recent military actions, such as airstrikes against Iranian nuclear facilities and drug trafficking operations in the Caribbean, have raised questions about the consistency of the administration's stated foreign policy principles [5][6]. Future Implications - Experts suggest that the U.S. may revert to traditional interventionist policies once it regains strength, indicating a potential return to historical patterns of interference in other nations' affairs [8][9]. - The effectiveness of the new interventionism remains uncertain, with no clear signs that the administration will reconsider its intervention policies in the near future [7].