美防长来了,核潜艇议题搅动韩国
Huan Qiu Shi Bao·2025-11-04 22:46

Core Viewpoint - The discussions between South Korea and the United States regarding South Korea's acquisition of nuclear-powered submarines have gained significant attention, with U.S. Defense Secretary confirming support for the initiative, while also highlighting the complexities involved in negotiations and regional implications [1][2][3]. Group 1: Nuclear Submarine Acquisition - South Korea's Defense Minister confirmed that U.S. President Trump has approved the construction of nuclear-powered submarines, with the U.S. military pledging full support [1][2]. - The first nuclear-powered submarine for South Korea is expected to be launched in the mid-2030s, contingent upon successful negotiations for nuclear fuel supply with the U.S. [2][4]. - The construction of these submarines is seen as a sensitive international issue, potentially leading to an arms race in the region [1][3][5]. Group 2: Bilateral Defense Relations - The U.S. is willing to deepen cooperation with South Korea in various naval capabilities, including submarines and surface vessels, as part of a broader strategy to revitalize the U.S. shipbuilding industry [2][3]. - Discussions also included South Korea's plans to increase its defense budget and enhance the strategic flexibility of U.S. forces stationed in South Korea [6]. - There are concerns that the reliance on U.S. support for defense initiatives may lead to a deeper dependency, complicating South Korea's strategic autonomy [5][7]. Group 3: Regional Security Dynamics - Analysts warn that South Korea's pursuit of nuclear submarines could disrupt the strategic balance in Northeast Asia, potentially escalating military tensions [3][5]. - The ongoing negotiations are expected to address critical issues such as construction locations, technology transfer, and nuclear fuel acquisition, which are likely to be contentious [3][6]. - The relationship between South Korea and the U.S. remains strong, but recent events indicate growing complexities and divergences in their defense and economic dealings [6][7].