最高法发布涉民营企业产权和民营企业家权益保护再审典型案例，多案改判无罪

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court has released four typical cases related to the protection of the rights and interests of private enterprises and entrepreneurs, emphasizing the principles of legality, restraint in criminal law, and equal protection under the law [1][2]. Group 1: Case Summaries - Case 1: The Supreme People's Court overturned the conviction of three individuals for falsely reporting registered capital and other charges, citing changes in company law that no longer classify their actions as criminal [4][5]. - Case 2: The court found that the actions of an individual accused of contract fraud did not demonstrate intent to illegally possess property, leading to a not guilty verdict [6][7]. - Case 3: The court determined that the personal and company assets of an individual were so intertwined that it could not be established that the individual had committed embezzlement or misappropriation of funds, resulting in a not guilty verdict [10][12]. - Case 4: The court ruled that a mining company must pay the remaining transfer price for coal mine shares, correcting a previous ruling that limited the company's liability [16][17]. Group 2: Legal Principles - The cases highlight the importance of adhering to the principle of legality in criminal law, ensuring that individuals are not prosecuted under outdated legal standards [2][5]. - The decisions reflect a commitment to distinguishing between economic disputes and criminal acts, reinforcing the need for clear evidence of intent in fraud cases [7][12]. - The rulings demonstrate a commitment to equal legal protection for both private and state-owned enterprises, fostering a fair business environment [17].