两部门通报：部分地方仍存在违法占地破坏耕地问题

Core Viewpoint - The Ministry of Natural Resources and the National Forestry and Grassland Administration reported on November 5, 2025, highlighting 14 typical illegal activities discovered during inspections and law enforcement supervision in the third quarter of 2025, including illegal land occupation, illegal mining, and ecological destruction, with some cases involving fraudulent rectification efforts [2][6]. Group 1: Illegal Land Occupation - Hebei Province's Xuanhua Huasheng Steel Co., Ltd. illegally occupied 118.24 acres of forest land for mining without obtaining necessary permits since June 2020 [2]. - In Liaoning Province, the New Da (Liaoning) Tourism Development Co., Ltd. unlawfully occupied 44.44 acres of land, including 30.54 acres of black soil farmland, for a leisure tourism project [2]. - In Henan Province, illegal sand extraction activities damaged 68.82 acres of permanent basic farmland from April 2020 to March 2025 [3]. - Guizhou Province's Zunyi City illegally occupied 273.61 acres of land for the construction of a scenic area without proper approvals [3]. Group 2: Illegal Mining Activities - Shanxi Province's Qiangsheng Sand and Stone Co., Ltd. illegally changed its mining operations from sand to iron ore without proper authorization [4]. - Chongqing's Fengdu County government allowed the illegal mining of 33.59 million tons of building sand by a local company under the guise of agricultural construction [4]. Group 3: Ecological Destruction - In Inner Mongolia, an individual illegally cleared 129.19 acres of forest land for cultivation [5]. - A company in Guangxi illegally occupied 915.23 acres of forest land for mining and construction activities without approval [6]. - Hainan Province's Chengmai Changfeng Energy-saving Building Materials Co., Ltd. was found to have engaged in fraudulent rectification regarding illegal land occupation, misleading authorities about compliance [6]. Group 4: Regulatory Response - The Ministry of Natural Resources and the National Forestry and Grassland Administration emphasized the need for local governments to rectify and address these issues in accordance with laws and regulations, avoiding simplistic or one-size-fits-all solutions [6][7].