特朗普：输了麻烦就大了

Core Points - The U.S. Supreme Court is questioning the legality of Trump's comprehensive tariff policy, with several justices expressing skepticism about the administration's use of a 50-year-old law to justify these tariffs [1][2] - Trump's administration invoked the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 to implement tariffs, a move that has not been previously used by any president [1] - The Supreme Court's decision could take weeks or months, and even if the administration loses, it may still pursue tariffs under other legal frameworks [3] Group 1 - The Supreme Court is hearing oral arguments regarding the legality of Trump's tariff policy, with both conservative and liberal justices raising pointed questions [1][2] - The administration's reliance on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act has been challenged by businesses and states, leading to previous court rulings against the policy [1] - Trump's comments indicate that a loss in court would have "devastating" consequences, highlighting the high stakes involved in the case [1][3] Group 2 - The Supreme Court consists of nine justices, with a majority being conservative, which may influence the outcome of the case [2][3] - Even if the Supreme Court limits the administration's power to impose tariffs, it is unlikely to completely eliminate the comprehensive tariff policy [2] - The U.S. Treasury Secretary has indicated that the administration may continue to use other legal authorities to maintain tariff policies if the current ones are overturned [3]