装点门面的钱，能减就减

Core Points - The newly revised regulations emphasize the need for government agencies to cut unnecessary expenditures and focus on practical spending, particularly discouraging "face projects" that waste public funds [1][2] - Recent reports highlight various cases of wasteful spending, such as extravagant landscape projects and underutilized public facilities, which undermine government credibility and public trust [1] - The essence of "face projects" is linked to a distorted performance outlook and a lack of accountability among officials, leading to superficial spending without addressing actual needs [1] Summary by Sections - Government Spending Regulations - The revised regulations aim to tighten control over government spending, ensuring that every penny is spent wisely and transparently [1] - The focus is on eliminating unnecessary expenditures that serve only to enhance appearances rather than deliver real value [1] - Examples of Wasteful Spending - Numerous cases have been reported where funds were misallocated to projects that ultimately failed to deliver, such as abandoned scenic projects and underused public restrooms [1] - These projects often disguise themselves as innovative or beneficial but result in significant waste of financial resources [1] - Accountability and Performance Evaluation - There is a call for stricter supervision and accountability for those involved in "face projects," with a push for reforms in performance evaluation to prioritize tangible results [2] - The goal is to ensure that government officials focus on practical contributions to society rather than superficial displays of spending [2]