Group 1 - The World Internet Conference in Wuzhen hosted a forum focused on "Constructing Consensus on Good Laws and Governance for Artificial Intelligence" [2] - Judge Zhu Ge from the Beijing Internet Court shared multiple judicial cases involving AI, emphasizing the importance of identifying the individuals behind AI technologies who should hold rights and responsibilities [2][4] - A notable case discussed involved the first national copyright infringement case related to AI-generated images, where the court ruled that the creator of the prompt for the AI tool holds copyright, not the AI itself [2][3] Group 2 - In another case regarding the obligation to identify AI-generated content, the court ruled against a platform that failed to label AI-generated content, highlighting the platform's responsibility to provide evidence [3] - Zhu Ge stressed the need for precise standards in cases of personality rights infringement, differentiating between public and private dissemination of AI-generated content [3] - The discussion on virtual digital humans indicated that existing legal frameworks should be applied to assess rights protection, regardless of the technological advancements [3][4] Group 3 - Zhu Ge summarized three key principles in AI judicial practice: ruling based on existing laws to provide market stability, identifying the individuals behind AI to assign rights and responsibilities, and forming rules through case-by-case recognition to balance innovation and interest protection [4] - The approach emphasizes using judicial rulings to establish rules, which in turn promote governance and support development [4]
朱阁谈涉AI官司审判:找到背后的人,由人享有权利承担责任
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao·2025-11-09 08:27