“救命器材”竟成“摆设”，不合格消防产品何以流入市场？

Core Points - The investigation reveals that substandard fire safety equipment poses significant risks, potentially failing in critical moments and becoming sources of danger themselves [1] - The quality of fire safety products varies greatly, with some manufacturers using inferior materials to cut costs, leading to high rates of non-compliance in inspections [2][4] - Regulatory weaknesses allow substandard products to enter the market, with low production barriers and inadequate enforcement of safety standards [4][6] Group 1: Product Quality Issues - Key materials in fire safety products are often substituted with inferior alternatives, compromising their effectiveness [2][3] - For example, some fire extinguishers contain only 43.8% of the required active ingredient, significantly below the 75% standard [2] - The non-compliance rates for various fire safety products, such as fire doors and self-rescue breathing apparatus, are concerning, with rates of 9.4%, 9.1%, and 4.2% respectively [2] Group 2: Regulatory and Market Challenges - The production of fire safety equipment is often unregulated, with many manufacturers operating in substandard conditions [4][5] - Some legitimate manufacturers produce non-compliant products due to pressure from customers seeking lower prices [5] - The lack of stringent enforcement and low penalties for violations contribute to the prevalence of substandard products in the market [6] Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - Experts suggest enhancing oversight through a comprehensive regulatory framework that includes source control, process supervision, and market guidance [7] - Establishing a shared information platform for monitoring the flow and compliance of fire safety products is recommended [7] - Strengthening the responsibility of users and increasing public awareness about the importance of quality fire safety products can help reduce the market for inferior goods [7][8]