LOOTOM(SZ:300555) Di Yi Cai Jing·2025-11-10 14:48Core Viewpoint - The recent shareholder meeting and board decisions at ST Luton (300555.SZ) have led to significant changes in control, with the original chairman being removed and a new chairman appointed amid ongoing disputes between shareholders [1][5][8]. Group 1: Shareholder Meeting Developments - The shareholder meeting on November 7 was initially postponed by the original chairman, Qiu Jingwei, which faced strong opposition from shareholders including Wu Shichun, leading to a chaotic scene [1][3]. - After a heated debate, Wu Shichun and other shareholders successfully reconvened the meeting, resulting in the dismissal of Qiu Jingwei and former deputy general manager Fu Xinyue, while Wu's nominee, Tan Wenshu, was elected as a non-independent director [1][5]. - The board convened immediately after the meeting to elect Tan Wenshu as the new chairman and made significant changes to the board's committee structure, dismissing three senior executives [5][6]. Group 2: Control Dispute Background - The conflict originated in March when Wu Shichun acquired a 7.44% stake in ST Luton through a judicial auction, becoming the largest shareholder, which led to disagreements over the validity of his acquisition agreements [2][8]. - Wu Shichun's attempts to reorganize the board were repeatedly blocked by the original management, escalating tensions between the two parties [2][8]. - The original management, led by Qiu Jingwei, has claimed that Wu's acquisition and subsequent actions were not compliant with regulations, asserting that he must prove the legality of his funding sources and the legitimacy of his agreements [8][11]. Group 3: Legal and Regulatory Issues - The original management has raised concerns about the legality of Wu Shichun's actions, including allegations of unauthorized increases in voting rights and failure to disclose necessary information [10][11]. - The board's decision to dismiss the lawsuit against Wu Shichun was based on the conclusion that the agreements related to share transfers did not meet regulatory requirements and were therefore invalid [12]. - The ongoing disputes have led to a complex legal landscape, with both sides asserting their positions regarding the legitimacy of the shareholder meeting and the decisions made therein [7][12].