Nanjing CIGU Technology (SH:688448) Xin Lang Cai Jing·2025-11-12 02:08Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the news is that Magv Technology's stock has increased by 5.17%, reaching a price of 47.20 yuan per share, with a trading volume of 286 million yuan and a turnover rate of 13.05%, resulting in a total market capitalization of 3.382 billion yuan [1] - Magv Technology, established on September 22, 2006, and listed on September 21, 2022, is based in Jiangning District, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province. The company specializes in the research, production, and sales of magnetic suspension fluid machinery, magnetic suspension bearings, high-speed motors, and high-speed drives [1] - The main revenue composition of Magv Technology includes 84.85% from magnetic suspension air products, 10.75% from other products, 4.32% from magnetic suspension special media products, and 0.09% from contract energy management [1] Group 2 - Among the top circulating shareholders of Magv Technology, the Agricultural Bank of China Huiri Fund has a fund that entered the top ten circulating shareholders, holding 1.1115 million shares, which accounts for 2.32% of the circulating shares. The estimated floating profit today is approximately 2.5787 million yuan [2] - The Agricultural Bank of China Huiri New Energy Mixed A Fund (002190) was established on March 29, 2016, with a latest scale of 8.786 billion yuan. Year-to-date returns are 34.48%, ranking 2359 out of 8147 in its category; the one-year return is 19.48%, ranking 3447 out of 8056; and since inception, the return is 200.27% [2] Group 3 - The fund managers of Agricultural Bank of China Huiri New Energy Mixed A Fund are Zuo Tengfei and Xing Junliang. As of the report, Zuo Tengfei has a cumulative tenure of 1 year and 281 days, with a total fund asset size of 8.856 billion yuan, achieving a best fund return of 55.13% and a worst return of 54.05% during his tenure [3] - Xing Junliang has a cumulative tenure of 4 years and 122 days, with a total fund asset size of 9.571 billion yuan, achieving a best fund return of 46.09% and a worst return of -34.63% during his tenure [3]