【首席观察】“以债补贷”下的中国货币新信用结构

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the shift in China's monetary structure from "credit-driven" to a new model characterized by "debt supplementing loans" and a focus on direct financing, despite the overall monetary conditions appearing loose [2][3][4]. Monetary and Financial Data - As of the end of October, M2 balance reached 335.13 trillion yuan, growing by 8.2% year-on-year, while the total social financing scale stood at 437.72 trillion yuan, with an 8.5% year-on-year increase [3]. - The balance of RMB loans was 270.61 trillion yuan, with a year-on-year growth of only 6.5%, marking a historical low [3][4]. - Government bonds saw a significant increase, with a year-on-year growth of 19.2%, raising their share in the total social financing scale to 21.3% [3][4]. Structural Changes in Financing - The proportion of RMB loans in the total social financing scale decreased by 1.3 percentage points, while direct financing, including government bonds and corporate bonds, increased its share to 44.4% [5][6]. - The shift towards direct financing is a policy choice reflecting the transition from high-speed growth to high-quality development, indicating a need for structural adjustments in the financial system [6][7]. Market Dynamics - The article notes that while the stock market indices have reached new highs, the underlying effective financing demand in the real economy remains weak, suggesting a disconnect between market performance and economic fundamentals [9][10]. - The emphasis on direct financing and the adjustment of interest rate relationships are seen as efforts to enhance the role of capital markets in the financial system [9][10]. Future Considerations - The article highlights three critical factors that will determine the success of this structural transition: the sustainability of corporate profitability, the alignment of institutional frameworks with higher direct financing ratios, and changes in household asset allocation behavior [12]. - The ongoing structural transition is viewed as a complex process that requires time and confidence to fully materialize, with the potential for a more balanced relationship between monetary policy, fiscal measures, and capital market dynamics [13][14].