中方代表：日本毫无资格要求成为安理会常任理事国！起底高市黑历史

Core Points - The article discusses China's strong condemnation of Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida's remarks regarding Taiwan, which are seen as a provocation and a violation of China's sovereignty [1][2][3] - It highlights the historical context of Japan's colonial actions in Taiwan and the implications of Kishida's statements on regional security [12][13][18] Group 1: China's Response - China's UN representative Fu Cong criticized Kishida's comments as dangerous and a gross interference in China's internal affairs, asserting that Taiwan is an inseparable part of China [1][2] - Fu emphasized that Japan's historical aggression and colonial crimes cannot be overlooked, questioning Japan's commitment to peace and its qualifications for a permanent seat on the UN Security Council [2][12] - The Chinese government has demanded that Japan retract its provocative statements and provide a clear explanation to the Chinese people [5][6] Group 2: Japan's Military Policy Shift - Kishida's government is reportedly considering modifying Japan's "Three Non-Nuclear Principles," which could allow for the introduction of nuclear weapons and a shift towards a more aggressive military posture [14][16] - Analysts suggest that Japan is moving from a defensive to a potentially offensive military strategy, raising concerns about regional stability [16][17] - Kishida's administration is seen as continuing and intensifying the militaristic policies of former Prime Minister Abe, including increasing defense spending and enhancing military capabilities [17][20] Group 3: Historical Context - The article outlines Japan's historical responsibility regarding Taiwan, noting that Japan's colonial rule from 1895 to 1945 caused significant suffering to the Taiwanese people [12][13] - It argues that Japan lacks the moral authority to comment on Taiwan's situation due to its past actions and the ongoing implications of its militaristic rhetoric [3][12] Group 4: Regional Implications - Kishida's remarks have sparked criticism and protests, with experts suggesting that they are aimed at stirring tensions between China and Japan while aligning Japan more closely with U.S. strategic interests [9][13] - The potential for Japan to engage in military actions under the guise of collective self-defense raises alarms about escalating conflicts in the region [11][20]