VONG vs. IWO: Does Large-Cap Growth or Small-Cap Diversification Pay Off More for Investors?

Core Insights - The Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has advantages such as lower fees and stronger recent returns compared to the iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO), which offers broader small-cap growth exposure and a slightly higher yield [1][2]. Cost & Size Comparison - VONG has an expense ratio of 0.07%, significantly lower than IWO's 0.24% - VONG's one-year return is 19.3%, while IWO's is 4.56% - VONG has a dividend yield of 0.46%, compared to IWO's 0.66% - VONG's assets under management (AUM) stand at $41.7 billion, while IWO's AUM is $12.95 billion [3]. Performance & Risk Metrics - VONG's maximum drawdown over five years is -32.72%, while IWO's is -42.02% - An investment of $1,000 in VONG would grow to $2,061 over five years, compared to $1,220 for IWO [4]. Fund Composition - IWO targets small-cap U.S. growth stocks with 1,090 holdings, primarily in technology (25%), healthcare (22%), and industrials (21%) - The top holdings in IWO are evenly distributed, with no single holding exceeding 2% of total assets - VONG is concentrated in large-cap growth, with technology making up 54% of its portfolio, followed by consumer cyclical (13%) and communication services (12%) - The top three holdings in VONG (Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft) account for over 36% of the fund [5][6]. Investment Considerations - VONG may appear superior due to its lower expense ratio, less severe maximum drawdown, and higher returns, but it has a heavy reliance on the tech sector, which limits diversification and increases risk [8]. - IWO, while experiencing lower recent returns, offers broader diversification and potential for explosive growth in small-cap stocks [9]. - The choice between VONG and IWO depends on whether an investor seeks large-cap growth or small-cap diversification [10].