最高法发布2025年中国反家暴典型案例

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court of China has released eight typical cases related to domestic violence to enhance the implementation of the Anti-Domestic Violence Law and provide guidance on legal application, evidence recognition, and handling measures [1][3]. Group 1: Characteristics of Domestic Violence Cases - Domestic violence is not merely a family dispute; it includes psychological abuse, which is also considered domestic violence [1][2]. - Courts are encouraged to comprehensively assess the characteristics of domestic violence cases and may allow experts to provide assistance when necessary [2][3]. - Special attention is given to the judicial protection of vulnerable groups, particularly minors, emphasizing the principle of maximizing the interests of minors [2][3]. Group 2: Judicial Attitude and Responsibilities - The release of these cases demonstrates the court's commitment to safeguarding the rights of women and children and its zero-tolerance stance towards domestic violence [3]. - The courts play a crucial role in protecting victims, punishing perpetrators, and restoring social relationships [3]. Group 3: Typical Cases Overview - Case 1: Psychological abuse through continuous humiliation and degradation constitutes severe abuse, leading to a conviction for abuse [5][6]. - Case 2: The court recognized the influence of domestic violence on the victim's behavior and allowed expert testimony to clarify the psychological aspects of the case [10][11]. - Case 3: The court emphasized the need to accurately characterize the perpetrator's actions in light of domestic violence characteristics [14][15]. - Case 4: The victim's statements, which included non-knowable details, were deemed credible, leading to a conviction for sexual offenses [18][19]. - Case 5: The issuance of a protection order was facilitated through a one-stop collaborative intervention mechanism, highlighting the importance of community involvement [22][23]. - Case 6: The court ruled that violent discipline should be recognized as domestic violence, impacting custody decisions [27][28]. - Case 7: The court supported compensation for domestic labor and damages in divorce proceedings, ensuring financial protection for victims [32][33]. - Case 8: The court ruled that perpetrators of domestic violence should generally not have custody of minors, reflecting a protective stance towards children [37].