岂能将知识产权保护武器化

Core Points - The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has modified the transparency rules for patent invalidation applications, particularly scrutinizing those from foreign companies, which is seen as a discriminatory measure against Chinese enterprises [1][2] - This change is perceived as an attempt to weaponize intellectual property protection, undermining China's technological innovation capabilities and legal rights in the U.S. market [1][2] - The adjustment to the rules is viewed as a geopolitical maneuver rather than a genuine effort to enhance the patent system, reflecting the U.S.'s anxiety over China's advancements in key technology sectors [2][3] Group 1 - The U.S. has historically maintained economic hegemony through its advantages in capital and technology, but is now increasingly anxious about China's rapid progress in critical technology fields [2] - The modification of the patent invalidation application rules is seen as a selective barrier aimed at weakening the legal recourse of Chinese companies in the U.S. [1][2] - The U.S. has criticized China for insufficient reforms in intellectual property protection while ignoring China's substantial efforts and achievements in this area [2] Group 2 - Intellectual property should serve the advancement of technology for all humanity, rather than being used as a political tool by individual countries [3] - The weaponization of intellectual property protection is expected to hinder global technological collaboration and disrupt market fairness and innovation environments [3] - Such actions by the U.S. may ultimately damage its own institutional credibility and innovative capacity [3]