Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights that Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida's remarks regarding Taiwan violate important political documents between Japan and China and deviate from Japan's long-standing commitment to peace [1][3] - Military commentator Konomi Makoto emphasizes that Kishida's statements could be interpreted as a signal of war to China, particularly if "Taiwan's situation" is deemed a "survival crisis" allowing Japan's Self-Defense Forces to engage in collective self-defense [1] - There is a significant public protest in Japan against Kishida's comments, with hundreds gathering to demand retraction and clarification, indicating a disconnect between government policy and public sentiment [3] Group 2 - Konomi Makoto notes that many Japanese citizens and media have not fully grasped the seriousness of the situation, primarily due to the ambiguous nature of the term "survival crisis" [3] - The current government policy under Kishida is seen as lacking broad societal support, as the Japanese public generally values peace and would oppose any military action against China [3] - There is a noted lack of public understanding regarding the deployment of missiles by the Self-Defense Forces in Okinawa and the concept of security represented by "survival crisis," which is exacerbated by insufficient government communication and biased media reporting [3]
日本军事评论家:高市早苗涉台谬论严重背离日本民众和平意愿
Xin Hua Wang·2025-11-22 10:39