大鹏工业战略配售“肥”了自家人!实控人和亲哥哥一天浮盈2492万元

Core Viewpoint - Dapeng Industrial's IPO on November 21 saw its stock price surge over 12 times on the first day, setting a new record for the Beijing Stock Exchange, raising concerns about the allocation of strategic placement shares primarily benefiting insiders [2][3][10] Summary by Sections IPO Performance - Dapeng Industrial's stock opened with a nearly 290% increase, reaching a maximum intraday gain of 1666.67%, and closing with a rise of 1211.11% [2] Strategic Placement Allocation - The strategic placement for Dapeng Industrial's IPO was primarily allocated to an employee asset management plan and a few external institutions, with only 10% of the total IPO issuance allocated to strategic placement, significantly below the 30% cap [3][12] - The employee asset management plan accounted for 60% of the strategic placement, with three executives collectively investing 3.558 million yuan [3][5] Executive Participation - The three executives involved in the strategic placement had a total estimated floating profit of 43.09 million yuan on the first day of trading, with the chairman and his brother alone earning 24.92 million yuan [8][9] - Similar trends were observed in other companies like Hengdongguang and Jiangtian Technology, where strategic placement shares were heavily tilted towards a few executives and core employees [5][6][7] Market Trends and Future Outlook - The average first-day gain for new stocks on the Beijing Stock Exchange this year has been 363.6%, with expectations of significant profits for executives involved in strategic placements [8][9] - The potential for substantial floating profits for executives in companies like Hengdongguang is projected to exceed 100 million yuan post-IPO [9] Regulatory Concerns - Legal experts have raised concerns that the current allocation practices may undermine the original intent of strategic placements, which is to optimize the company's equity structure and promote long-term development [10][15] - The trend of insiders benefiting disproportionately from strategic placements has sparked discussions about the need for regulatory reforms to ensure fairer distribution and participation from external investors [10][16]