普丽妍发公告“封杀”新氧系门店，新氧回应：传播不实信息，已发律师函

Core Viewpoint - The recent statements from Purity and New Oxygen highlight a significant dispute regarding the use and distribution of Purity's products, with both companies asserting their positions on product safety and legitimacy [1][2][3] Group 1: Purity's Statement - Purity has released a formal statement identifying several unauthorized medical institutions, including over 40 New Oxygen stores, which are now on a "never cooperate" blacklist [1] - The company emphasizes that the listed institutions did not procure products through official channels, thus denying any responsibility for the authenticity of the products used by these institutions [1] - Purity asserts that its products should only be used in officially approved medical institutions by qualified professionals who have received proper training [1] Group 2: New Oxygen's Response - New Oxygen has issued a statement refuting Purity's claims, asserting that all products used in their clinics are sourced from legally qualified suppliers with complete procurement documentation [2] - The company highlights that its clinics are legally approved medical institutions, and the doctors operate in compliance with medical laws and regulations [2] - New Oxygen condemns the dissemination of misleading information that could harm its reputation and consumer trust, stating that such actions disrupt fair market competition [3] Group 3: Legal Actions and Consumer Rights - New Oxygen has taken legal steps by commissioning a law firm to demand the removal of Purity's statements, seeking to protect its reputation and consumer rights [3] - The company emphasizes the importance of professional support from upstream manufacturers, arguing that it should not be manipulated for market control or to impose barriers on medical institutions [3]