行业地位是否“注水”？核心产品均价、毛利率走低！长裕集团回应三大核心问题

Core Viewpoint - Changyu Group is undergoing a second round of IPO review by the Shanghai Stock Exchange, addressing key issues related to consolidated financial statements, industry representation, and accounting treatment [1][2]. Group 1: IPO Details - Changyu Group's IPO was accepted on May 21, 2025, with a fundraising target of 7.13 billion yuan [2]. - The company is primarily engaged in the research, production, and sales of zirconium products, specialty nylon products, and fine chemical products [2]. - The IPO proceeds will be used for projects including 45,000 tons of ultra-pure zirconium chloride and 10,000 tons of high-performance nylon elastomer products [3]. Group 2: Financial and Operational Performance - The company reported fluctuating financial performance from 2022 to mid-2025, with revenues of 1.669 billion yuan, 1.608 billion yuan, 1.638 billion yuan, and 897 million yuan, and net profits of 263 million yuan, 195 million yuan, 212 million yuan, and 113 million yuan respectively [9]. - The average selling price of zirconium products has been declining, with prices of 24,000 yuan/ton, 20,200 yuan/ton, 18,000 yuan/ton, and 17,800 yuan/ton over the reporting periods [10][11]. - The gross profit margin for the main business has shown volatility, with rates of 28.35%, 23.27%, 23.83%, and 23.54% during the reporting periods [10]. Group 3: Market Position and Industry Representation - Changyu Group claims to be the largest producer of zirconium chloride globally, with a production capacity of 75,000 tons per year [5]. - The company estimates a domestic market share of approximately 29.64% and a global market share of about 22.62% for zirconium chloride in 2024 [6]. - The Shanghai Stock Exchange has requested further evidence regarding the company's market share and industry ranking [5]. Group 4: Accounting and Compliance Issues - The Shanghai Stock Exchange raised concerns about the consolidation of joint ventures, questioning whether Changyu Group has control over its joint ventures based on their governance structures [4]. - The company has defended its accounting treatment of CIF shipping costs, asserting compliance with international trade terms and accounting standards [8].