【环球财经】“28点新计划”变“19点”，美乌版方案改了哪些

Core Viewpoint - The recent negotiations between the U.S. and Ukraine in Geneva have resulted in a revised plan to address the Ukraine crisis, reducing the original 28-point proposal to 19 points, with some contentious issues left for the presidents of both countries to decide [1][2]. Group 1: Modifications to the Plan - The revised plan does not impose strict limits on the size of the Ukrainian military, unlike the previous version which capped it at 600,000 personnel [3]. - The new proposal excludes provisions for the amnesty of war crimes committed during the conflict and postpones discussions on territorial divisions, Ukraine's potential NATO membership, and security guarantees [3]. - Ukrainian officials indicated that while the new wording is not fully acceptable, it is at least open for consideration, contrasting with the earlier plan which was perceived as an ultimatum [4]. Group 2: Reactions and Implications - European leaders emphasized the necessity for Europe and Ukraine to play a significant role in the peace agreement process, with Germany's Chancellor asserting that Ukraine's sovereignty must not be compromised [4]. - Analysts believe that the revised plan reflects a shift closer to Ukraine's position, potentially making it more palatable for Ukrainian interests while remaining contentious for Russia [4]. - The Russian government has yet to respond to the new 19-point plan, with officials expressing skepticism about the information received from the U.S. [5]. Group 3: Ongoing Negotiations and Challenges - The negotiation process for a peace agreement may take months or even up to a year, with significant divisions remaining on territorial and security issues [6]. - Russia demands full control over the Donbas region, while Ukraine insists on negotiations based on the current contact line [6]. - The U.S. administration's fluctuating stance on the conflict resolution reflects a broader strategy aimed at achieving diplomatic success ahead of upcoming elections, rather than addressing the root causes of the conflict [7].