Xin Lang Cai Jing·2025-11-26 02:11Core Viewpoint - The recent announcement by Minsheng Bank regarding the prohibition of violent debt collection in its personal non-performing loan transfer has sparked significant industry discussion, reflecting a cautious approach towards debt collection methods in the banking sector [1][3][4]. Group 1: Non-Performing Loans Market - As the year-end approaches, the market for non-performing loan transfers is seeing a surge, with various commercial banks and consumer finance companies listing large non-performing asset packages, particularly in retail loans such as personal non-performing loans and credit card overdrafts [1][3]. - Minsheng Bank's latest personal non-performing loan transfer project involves a total unpaid principal of approximately 2.447 billion yuan and unpaid interest of about 2.695 billion yuan, totaling 5.142 billion yuan across 147,779 borrowers, with an average overdue period of 1,856.28 days [3][4]. Group 2: Debt Collection Practices - The announcement from Minsheng Bank includes a rare clause that prohibits violent debt collection and mandates that the assignee can only use legitimate means for asset disposal, reflecting the bank's cautious stance on collection methods [4][6]. - The trend of outsourcing debt collection to third-party companies has led to compliance issues, with instances of soft violent collection practices being reported, prompting regulatory scrutiny and penalties for banks like Zhejiang Wangshang Bank [6][7]. Group 3: Regulatory Environment - The regulatory environment surrounding debt collection has tightened, with numerous financial institutions facing penalties for improper collection practices, highlighting the ongoing challenges in managing outsourced collection operations [6][16]. - The introduction of national guidelines for post-loan collection practices aims to standardize and regulate the industry, providing a framework to identify and prevent violent collection behaviors [20].