Xin Lang Ke Ji·2025-11-26 07:36Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear Apple and Broadcom's challenge regarding the validity of Caltech's data transmission patents, while a jury's earlier ruling requiring the companies to pay $1.1 billion in damages was sent back for reconsideration [1] Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The Supreme Court rejected Apple and Broadcom's appeal against a lower court ruling that confirmed a preliminary judge's decision, which did not allow the companies to contest the patent's validity in the lawsuit [1] - The U.S. Federal Circuit Court upheld the initial judge's decision, stating that Apple and Broadcom failed to raise their arguments during the earlier review process by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office [2] Group 2: Financial Implications - A jury previously determined that Apple should pay $837.8 million and Broadcom $270.2 million for infringing Caltech's patents, but the Federal Circuit Court questioned the damages amount and sent the case back for a reassessment of appropriate compensation [1] - Broadcom estimates that 20% of its revenue comes from Apple, highlighting the financial significance of their relationship [2] Group 3: Background Information - Caltech filed a lawsuit against Apple and Broadcom in 2016, claiming that millions of devices using Broadcom's Wi-Fi chips, including iPhones, iPads, and Apple Watches, infringed on its data transmission patents [1]