仲调协同破解资本市场纠纷难题 证券期货纠纷仲调对接活动在沪举办

Core Viewpoint - The collaboration between the China Securities Investor Service Center and the Shanghai Arbitration Commission aims to enhance the diversified resolution mechanism for capital market disputes, promoting the protection of small and medium investors' rights and contributing to the construction of Shanghai as an international financial center [1][2]. Group 1: Event Overview - A signing and unveiling ceremony for the securities and futures dispute mediation and arbitration connection was held in Shanghai on November 24, organized by the China Securities Investor Service Center and the Shanghai Arbitration Commission [1]. - The event gathered leaders from relevant departments and industry professionals to discuss new pathways for resolving capital market disputes [1]. Group 2: Key Statements - Liu Xiaohong, Director of the Shanghai Arbitration Commission, emphasized that the "mediation-arbitration connection" will effectively protect the legal rights of small and medium investors and support the development of a modern dispute resolution system [1]. - Lu Wenda, General Manager of the China Securities Investor Service Center, highlighted the importance of strengthening non-litigation dispute resolution mechanisms for the stability of the capital market and the protection of investors' rights [2]. Group 3: Future Directions - The collaboration will focus on optimizing fee rules, improving mediation-arbitration procedures, and establishing a dynamic rights confirmation mechanism to enhance efficiency and reduce costs for investors [5]. - Future efforts will include the establishment of a standardized case flow recognition mechanism and exploring preferential fee structures to benefit small and medium investors [5]. Group 4: Challenges and Recommendations - Industry representatives discussed challenges in financial dispute resolution, such as the insufficient enforceability of mediation agreements and inefficient mediation-arbitration processes [6]. - Recommendations included optimizing fee structures, clarifying procedural connections, and creating a case database to guide reasonable expectations [6].