专家：日本在台湾问题上“越轨”将承担恶果

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes China's firm stance on the Taiwan issue, highlighting that any attempts by Japan to challenge this position will not be tolerated, as articulated by Chinese officials [1][4]. Group 1: China's Position on Taiwan - China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs has reiterated that the Taiwan issue is a non-negotiable red line, with Foreign Minister Wang Yi stating three "absolutes" that must not be violated [1]. - The phrase "absolutely not allow" signifies China's unwavering commitment to its territorial integrity and national unity, indicating no room for compromise [1][4]. - The deterioration of Sino-Japanese relations is attributed to Japan's provocative statements regarding Taiwan, which are seen as a breach of the political foundation necessary for bilateral relations [1][3]. Group 2: Japan's Response and Strategy - Japan's government has maintained a "strategic ambiguity" regarding its stance on Taiwan, which reflects its perception of China as a competitor rather than a partner [3][8]. - The Japanese government has reiterated that its position remains unchanged, despite the controversial remarks made by Prime Minister Kishi Sanae, indicating a reluctance to clearly affirm the One China principle [4][6]. - Japan's historical approach to Taiwan has involved indirect and ambiguous strategies, often hiding its interventions within the framework of the US-Japan military alliance [6][8]. Group 3: Implications for Sino-Japanese Relations - The article suggests that Japan's failure to clearly respect the One China principle could lead to further deterioration in Sino-Japanese relations, impacting Japan's own interests [3][4]. - The ongoing strategic anxiety in Japan regarding Taiwan may lead to a more pronounced interventionist stance, which could exacerbate tensions with China [8]. - The article concludes that Japan's attempts to navigate the Taiwan issue through strategic ambiguity are unlikely to succeed in the face of China's strong resolve to maintain its territorial integrity [8].