基层培训“鸡同鸭讲” 成长之旅为何变成“打卡任务”

Core Insights - The article highlights the emergence of a "substitute economy" in professional training, where participants hire substitutes to attend training sessions on their behalf, undermining the intended purpose of these educational programs [1][2][3] Group 1: Training Practices and Issues - Many professionals, especially in government and enterprises, are required to participate in continuing education, but the training often fails to meet actual needs, leading to a disconnect between content and practical application [2][3] - Training sessions are frequently conducted in a "crash course" manner at the end of the year, conflicting with critical work periods, driven by budget management practices that penalize unspent funds [3] - The lack of genuine engagement in training is evident, with many attendees distracted by their phones or not participating actively, indicating a need for better content and delivery methods [2][3] Group 2: Comparison with Other Training Models - In contrast to professional training, non-academic extracurricular training for students is more effective because it is self-selected, personally funded, and focused on core developmental needs, leading to higher quality and effectiveness [3][4] - The article suggests that valuable training should not rely on attendance tracking or formal titles but should instead foster a genuine desire for personal growth and development [4]