Guo Ji Jin Rong Bao·2025-11-28 12:49Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the increasing normalization of banks adjusting the risk levels of mutual fund products they distribute, with several banks, including China Construction Bank, Minsheng Bank, and Postal Savings Bank, making multiple adjustments this year [1][2][3] - China Construction Bank announced a batch increase in risk levels for 87 mutual fund products, marking its fourth adjustment this year, with 32 products raised from R2 (medium-low risk) to R3 (medium risk) and 55 from R3 to R4 (medium-high risk) [2][3] - Minsheng Bank and Postal Savings Bank have also made similar adjustments, with Minsheng Bank raising the risk levels of eight low-risk fund products to medium risk, and Postal Savings Bank adjusting 86 mutual fund products in two recent announcements [2][3] Group 2 - The adjustments are attributed to a combination of factors including the characteristics of mutual fund products, market conditions, and regulatory guidance, which aim to reduce the risk mismatch between investors and products [2][3] - Regulatory frameworks, such as the Asset Management New Regulations, emphasize the importance of risk matching, compelling institutions to establish dynamic risk rating mechanisms to prevent ratings from lagging behind actual product risks [3][4] - The changes are expected to become a routine practice, as banks need to dynamically assess product risks to fulfill their suitability obligations and protect investor interests [3][4] Group 3 - The impact of these changes on investors is twofold; short-term, conservative investors may choose to redeem their investments due to increased risk levels, while long-term, dynamic rating mechanisms can enhance risk transparency and reduce mismatches [4][5] - The industry may shift from a product-selling approach to a service-oriented model, prompting fund companies to improve their research and investment capabilities, thereby fostering a healthier market ecosystem [4]