视频丨专家：高市早苗突出非法无效的“旧金山和约” 错上加错

Core Viewpoint - The remarks made by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi regarding Taiwan have faced significant criticism both domestically and internationally, with assertions that they undermine international law and the political foundation of Sino-Japanese relations [1][3]. Group 1: Legal and Historical Context - The "San Francisco Peace Treaty" is deemed illegal and invalid as it disregards China's sovereignty over Taiwan, which was affirmed by prior agreements such as the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation [3]. - The signing of the "San Francisco Peace Treaty" violated the principles established in the United Nations Declaration, indicating that it should not have addressed China's territorial issues without China's involvement [3]. Group 2: Political Implications - Takaichi's comments challenge the political foundation established by four key political documents between China and Japan, suggesting a departure from previously agreed-upon principles [3]. - The remarks are viewed as a threat to the post-war international order and the political basis of Sino-Japanese relations, with calls for adherence to international law and mutual respect [3][6]. Group 3: Reactions from Experts - Various experts, including legal scholars and political figures, have condemned Takaichi's statements as dangerous and a violation of international law, emphasizing the need for Japan to recognize Taiwan as an inseparable part of China [5][6][10]. - The comments have been characterized as not only a misinterpretation of historical facts but also a potential threat to peace and stability in international relations [6][9].