美步步紧逼引动武猜测，委内瑞拉谴责美“关闭空域”威胁

Core Viewpoint - The recent statement by President Trump declaring the airspace over Venezuela as "fully closed" has sparked strong reactions from the Venezuelan government and other Latin American countries, viewing it as a colonial threat and an act of aggression [1][3]. Group 1: U.S. Actions and Reactions - Trump's declaration on social media targeted airlines, pilots, drug traffickers, and human traffickers, indicating a significant escalation in U.S. military posture towards Venezuela [3]. - The Venezuelan government condemned the U.S. actions as unilateral and contrary to international law, urging global condemnation [3]. - Colombian President Petro emphasized that no foreign president has the authority to close another country's airspace, warning against the implications for national sovereignty and international law [3]. Group 2: Military Deployment and Strategy - The U.S. has reportedly increased military presence in the Caribbean, deploying advanced naval assets and conducting operations against suspected drug trafficking vessels, with at least 21 attacks resulting in 83 fatalities since September [5]. - Analysts suggest that the U.S. aims to isolate Venezuela and disrupt its logistics, thereby increasing pressure on President Maduro [1][5]. - Former U.S. military officials expressed concerns about the feasibility and resource requirements of establishing a no-fly zone over Venezuela, indicating that the declaration raises more questions than it answers [4]. Group 3: Legal and Ethical Concerns - Reports emerged regarding U.S. military operations that may have violated international law, with calls for accountability for actions taken against alleged drug traffickers [6]. - The U.S. Secretary of Defense defended military actions, labeling criticisms as "fake news," amidst growing scrutiny over the legality of these operations [7]. Group 4: Political Implications - Trump's recent communications with Maduro and the simultaneous announcement of pardoning a former Honduran president have raised questions about the consistency of U.S. foreign policy towards Latin America [8]. - Democratic lawmakers criticized the administration's narrative on drug trafficking, suggesting it reflects a broader inconsistency in U.S. strategy in the region [8].