董事举报！参加董事会遭阻，同一董事会会议开两次

Core Viewpoint - The internal governance struggle at ST Yinjian is highlighted by the recent board meeting controversies, including absenteeism and lack of transparency in decision-making processes [1][4]. Group 1: Board Meeting Controversies - On November 18, ST Yinjian announced that the board approved new candidates with a unanimous vote of 5 in favor, 0 against, and 0 abstentions, despite two directors being absent [3]. - The two absent directors, Peng Xiaoyong and Cai Yang, claimed they were not absent voluntarily but were unable to attend due to a lack of communication from the acting chairman, leading to their "passive absence" [4][6]. - Peng Xiaoyong revealed that a board meeting had already been held on November 12 to discuss the same matters, where they voted against the proposals, but the company did not disclose the resolutions from that meeting [4][12]. Group 2: Communication Issues - Peng Xiaoyong expressed concerns about the serious violations in the meeting's convening and decision-making process, stating that he did not receive the meeting link until 28 hours after the meeting had already taken place [6][9]. - The acting chairman, Han Zhenxing, failed to provide the necessary meeting details and link in a timely manner, which is considered abnormal by Peng Xiaoyong [10]. - Peng Xiaoyong and Cai Yang reported that they were unable to review the agenda adequately before voting, leading them to oppose all proposals during the meetings [12][13]. Group 3: Legal Actions and Governance Issues - Peng Xiaoyong has reported the situation to regulatory authorities and has filed a lawsuit against the company, seeking to annul the decisions made under significant procedural flaws [13]. - A senior lawyer noted that the board's voting results should be disclosed promptly, and failure to do so due to opposing votes or lack of participation contradicts information disclosure regulations [15]. - The previous company secretary resigned after only two and a half months, indicating potential instability within the company's governance structure [16][18].