普惠金融“提质”进行时：数智化浪潮下，如何寻求差异化路径

Core Viewpoint - The introduction of the "Implementation Plan for High-Quality Development of Inclusive Finance in the Banking and Insurance Industries" marks a critical transition for inclusive finance in China, shifting from quantity expansion to quality enhancement, aligning with the "14th Five-Year Plan" for financial strength [5][6]. Group 1: Transition Characteristics - The transition to high-quality development presents three core characteristics: 1. Shift from scale-driven to quality-oriented, with the balance of inclusive loans reaching 36 trillion yuan by June 2025, 2.36 times that of the end of the 13th Five-Year Plan, emphasizing precision and service efficiency [5][6]. 2. Expansion from single credit services to comprehensive service offerings, with 16 measures proposed to optimize the inclusive finance service system [5]. 3. Digitalization evolving from a tool to a production method, highlighting the role of data elements in reshaping traditional models [5][6]. Group 2: Key Challenges - The key challenges include: 1. Balancing risk costs with commercial sustainability [6]. 2. Avoiding homogenization among inclusive finance institutions [6]. 3. Addressing the weaknesses in rural credit systems [6]. Group 3: Differentiation Strategies for New Financial Institutions - New financial institutions like private banks and village banks face challenges of overlapping customer bases and insufficient risk control. They should focus on: 1. Market positioning differentiation, with village banks serving rural economies and private banks leveraging technology for private sector services [7]. 2. Service model differentiation, utilizing local advantages to avoid direct competition with traditional banks [7]. 3. Risk control technology differentiation, transitioning to a digital scoring model [7]. Group 4: Collaborative Ecosystem Development - The key to breaking through in digital inclusive finance lies in building a collaborative ecosystem of "technology, system, and data": 1. Financial institutions should treat data as a key production factor and develop online, intelligent financial products for small enterprises and rural areas [8][9]. 2. Institutional improvements are needed for risk compensation and policy credit mechanisms to support inclusive finance [9]. 3. The synergy between technology and institutional frameworks must be established to avoid disconnects between technical implementation and institutional design [9]. Group 5: Addressing Structural Issues in Inclusive Finance - The current structure of inclusive finance shows a dominance of credit services, with slower development of non-credit sectors like inclusive wealth management. To address this: 1. Service thresholds should be significantly lowered, with investment minimums for bank products reduced to 1 yuan and trust services to below 1 million yuan [10]. 2. Product adaptability should be enhanced, focusing on low-threshold, low-fee, and low-risk offerings for middle-class and underserved markets [10]. 3. Digital methods should improve service accessibility, transitioning non-credit services from high-net-worth individuals to broader populations [10]. Group 6: Digital Transformation Progress and Shortcomings - Financial institutions have made significant progress in digital transformation, with widespread use of large models for intelligent risk control and online loan processes. However, three structural shortcomings remain: 1. Insufficient strategic planning and organizational management capabilities, with some institutions still at the technical modification stage [12]. 2. Weak data governance and integration capabilities, lacking a systematic data governance framework [12]. 3. Mismatched service capabilities and technology iteration speeds, necessitating enhancements in digital support and data governance [12].