出席露天集会，回应美国施压，委内瑞拉总统宣示“不要奴隶式和平”

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. government's efforts to combat Venezuela's "drug trafficking ships" are facing a complex strategic, political, and legal dilemma, with President Trump seeking a way forward amid significant internal and external pressures [1][4]. Group 1: U.S. Government Actions - President Trump convened a meeting with national security officials to discuss potential actions against Venezuela, including the possibility of negotiating President Maduro's departure [1][3]. - The U.S. has reportedly set a deadline for Maduro to leave Venezuela by November 28, following a brief phone call where Maduro requested legal immunity for himself and his family [4][5]. - The U.S. military has conducted strikes against a Venezuelan ship allegedly involved in drug trafficking, which has raised questions about the legality and morality of these actions [6][7]. Group 2: Maduro's Response - President Maduro publicly rejected the idea of leaving power, emphasizing his commitment to his supporters and denouncing any form of "slave-like peace" [2][3]. - Maduro has proposed forming a temporary government led by Vice President Rodriguez and holding new elections, but many of his requests have been rejected by the Trump administration [5]. Group 3: Legal and Ethical Concerns - The U.S. Defense Secretary authorized strikes against a Venezuelan ship, which resulted in significant casualties, leading to accusations of potential war crimes and calls for investigation from both Democrats and some Republicans [6][8]. - The controversial nature of the strikes, particularly the follow-up attacks on survivors, has sparked intense scrutiny regarding adherence to international law and military ethics [7][8].