美接连威胁对委动手 暴露其极限施压未达预期

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles indicates that the recent threats from the U.S. to take military action against Venezuela reflect the failure of previous extreme pressure tactics, leading to a deepening crisis for the U.S. [1] - The U.S. has been conducting military deployments in Latin America and the Caribbean since late August, attempting to pressure Venezuela into political change, but these efforts have not yielded the desired results, as Maduro remains in power [1] - The military threats have resulted in a strong unifying effect within Venezuela, with the populace perceiving U.S. actions as self-serving, thus complicating the situation further [1] Group 2 - Domestically, 70% of the U.S. population opposes military action against Venezuela, questioning the rationale behind such actions [2] - The U.S. government's strategy of using drug trafficking as a pretext for pressure has not only failed to achieve its political objectives but has also backfired, particularly in the context of the upcoming midterm elections [2] - The ongoing military rhetoric, including the Defense Secretary's "leave no survivors" command, has led to increased scrutiny and criticism from the Democratic Party against the Republican administration [2] Group 3 - Should the U.S. proceed with military action against Venezuela, it could destabilize regional security and lead to unintended consequences for the U.S. itself [3] - The urgency to reassert dominance in the Western Hemisphere through military means may entrap the U.S. in a deeper conflict [3] - The potential for increased regional instability could result in humanitarian issues, such as a refugee crisis, which would further complicate the U.S. position [3]