将价值观导入流量，遏制不良大V反弹复发

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the need for strict regulation of online influencers to maintain a healthy online environment and prevent the spread of negative emotions and misinformation [1][3] - Recent actions taken by the Central Cyberspace Administration include a two-month campaign to address issues such as inciting extreme group emotions and promoting panic, which reflects a zero-tolerance approach towards harmful online behavior [1][3] - The crackdown on influencers like "Hu Chenfeng," "Zhang Xuefeng," and "Wang Zibai" highlights the ongoing efforts to ensure that online platforms adhere to legal and ethical standards [1][3] Group 2 - The implementation of a comprehensive governance mechanism requires online platforms to take responsibility for content management, including measures like real-name registration for accounts with over 500,000 followers and risk warnings for published content [2] - Platforms are encouraged to enhance content review processes by combining human oversight with intelligent systems to prevent the publication of harmful content [2] - There is a call for platforms to support positive content creation by incentivizing quality contributions and limiting the reach of problematic accounts [2] Group 3 - The legal foundation for online governance has strengthened with the establishment of laws such as the Cybersecurity Law and regulations for the protection of minors online, providing a robust framework for ecological governance [3] - Continuous refinement of enforcement measures and standards is necessary to ensure clarity and operability in the legal framework governing online behavior [3] - The ongoing "Qinglang Action" signifies the commitment of regulatory bodies to purify the online space, reinforcing the principle that the internet is not a lawless domain [3]