大疆经销商被指与商场签排他协议封杀影石 律师：或构成垄断

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a dispute involving a "exclusive agreement" that led to the demolition of a store sign for an Insta360 experience store in Hunan Photography City, highlighting potential anti-competitive practices and legal implications [1][12]. Group 1: Background of the Dispute - Zhang, a businessman with over 20 years in the photography equipment industry, was forced to remove the sign of his newly renovated Insta360 store due to an exclusive agreement between the management of Hunan Photography City and a DJI distributor [2][5]. - The exclusive agreement prohibits the entry of competing brands, specifically naming Insta360 as a strong competitor to DJI products [5][12]. Group 2: Legal Implications - Legal experts suggest that the exclusive agreement may violate anti-monopoly laws, as it restricts competition by preventing third-party brands from entering the market [12]. - The agreement's lack of public disclosure and its specific targeting of certain brands could be seen as undermining fair market competition and consumer choice [12]. Group 3: Market Context - The competitive landscape between DJI and Insta360 has intensified, with Insta360 holding a significant market share in the panoramic camera sector, while DJI has recently entered this market with aggressive pricing strategies [13]. - According to a report, Insta360 has maintained a global market share of over 85% in the panoramic camera segment for eight consecutive years, while DJI has captured approximately 17.1% of the global market share in Q3 [13].