Sen. Elizabeth Warren slams Netflix's $72B deal for WBD, calls it an ‘anti-monopoly nightmare'

Core Viewpoint - The acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery's studios and streaming division by Netflix for $72 billion is being criticized as an antitrust "nightmare" that could negatively impact workers and consumers, with bipartisan concerns emerging regarding the deal's implications for market competition and consumer choice [1][2][3]. Group 1: Political Reactions - Senator Elizabeth Warren described the deal as a threat to competition, suggesting it could lead to higher subscription prices and fewer choices for consumers [3][6]. - Republican Senator Mike Lee expressed that the acquisition should raise alarms for antitrust enforcers globally, warning it could end the "Golden Age of streaming" for content creators and consumers [5][9]. - Other Republican lawmakers, including Senator Roger Marshall and Representative Darrell Issa, have called for scrutiny from US antitrust enforcers, arguing that reduced competition could lead to fewer theatrical releases from Netflix [7]. Group 2: Market Impact - The merger would create a media giant controlling nearly half of the streaming market, raising concerns about its potential to increase subscription costs and limit consumer options [3][6]. - Netflix's acquisition of HBO Max, which has 128 million subscribers, would significantly enhance its market position, combining it with Netflix's existing 300 million subscribers [7][10]. Group 3: Company Position - Netflix has positioned the deal as beneficial for consumers, claiming it would create jobs and provide subscribers with more content, aligning with current governmental focuses on affordability [2][11]. - CEO Ted Sarandos expressed confidence in the regulatory process, asserting that the deal is pro-consumer, pro-innovation, and pro-worker [11][15].