多方呼吁正视历史真相,冲绳集会要求高市谢罪,侵华日军罪行再添新证
Huan Qiu Shi Bao·2025-12-05 22:41

Core Viewpoint - The commemoration of the 88th anniversary of the Nanjing Massacre highlights the importance of acknowledging historical atrocities committed by the Japanese military, with new artifacts and testimonies reinforcing the narrative of the event [1][3][4]. Group 1: Artifacts and Historical Evidence - A collection of 13 artifacts related to the Nanjing Massacre was donated to the Nanjing Massacre Memorial Hall, including letters from Japanese soldiers and photographs taken during the occupation [1][3]. - One letter from a soldier describes the brutal killings of Chinese prisoners, providing a firsthand account of the atrocities committed [3]. - Third-party publications from the United States and France serve as additional evidence, countering claims that downplay the scale of the massacre by highlighting the population of Nanjing before the occupation [3]. Group 2: Historical Reflection and Education - There is a growing call within Japan for a deeper reflection on the country's wartime history, particularly among younger generations who may lack knowledge of events like the Nanjing Massacre [4][5]. - A memorial event included a screening of a film about the Nanjing Massacre, emphasizing the importance of remembering and accurately conveying the historical facts [4]. - Participants at the memorial expressed the need for Japan to confront its past and engage in sincere historical education to foster trust with neighboring countries [4][5]. Group 3: International Perspectives and Reactions - Commentary from international observers highlights the bias in Western narratives regarding World War II, which often overlook the atrocities committed by Japanese forces in Asia [5]. - The need for Japan to acknowledge its historical responsibilities is emphasized, with calls for a halt to policies that could escalate tensions in the region [5]. - The discussion around historical revisionism in Japan is noted as a growing concern, with implications for international relations and the need for collective memory of past atrocities [5].