网络复制粘贴的人名，成了书法大赛大奖得主、政府采购“评审专家”，让“最忙五人组”彻底失业，须“网络无影灯”常亮不熄

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the absurdity of a group of five individuals, referred to as the "busiest five," who have been involved in various fraudulent activities across multiple sectors, exposing significant flaws in oversight and regulatory mechanisms [2][3][4]. Group 1: Fraudulent Activities - The "busiest five" are involved in government procurement, art competitions, and administrative penalties, showcasing a lack of integrity in official processes [2]. - Their names were directly copied from a public database, indicating a blatant disregard for authenticity and accountability in official documentation [2][4]. Group 2: Oversight Failures - The article emphasizes a complete breakdown of the supervision mechanism, with numerous instances of fraud going unchecked, such as the use of celebrity names in administrative penalties [2][4]. - The lack of internal oversight and the sluggishness of higher-level regulatory bodies are highlighted as critical issues that allow such fraud to persist [2][4]. Group 3: Public Response and Internet Supervision - The exposure of the "busiest five" serves as a testament to the power of internet supervision, which can illuminate areas where traditional oversight fails [5]. - The article advocates for a robust system that combines institutional oversight with public scrutiny to prevent future occurrences of fraud [6]. Group 4: Recommendations for Improvement - To combat such fraudulent activities, the article suggests implementing a verification system that connects public information with authoritative databases [6]. - It also calls for a clear accountability framework that ensures every step in the process is documented and responsible parties are held accountable [6].