“美国战略重大转向”，震动欧洲！俄总统新闻秘书：不再将俄称为“直接威胁”是积极举措，将详细研究

Core Points - The new U.S. National Security Strategy marks a significant shift from the long-standing "pivot to Asia" approach, emphasizing a focus on limited "core national interests" rather than global dominance [2] - The strategy indicates a prioritization of U.S. homeland and the Western Hemisphere, reflecting a return to "Monroe Doctrine" principles [5][6] - The report highlights a critical stance towards Europe, suggesting a decline in its global economic influence and calling for increased U.S. intervention in European internal affairs [11][12] Summary by Sections U.S. National Security Strategy - The report states that the pursuit of "permanent global dominance" is fundamentally unattainable and detrimental to the U.S. middle class and industrial base [2] - It aims to protect prioritized national interests rather than attempting to address all global issues [2] Focus on the Western Hemisphere - U.S. Defense Secretary emphasizes prioritizing national interests, particularly in the homeland and the Western Hemisphere, and calls for increased military presence in Latin America [3][4] - The strategy is seen as a revival of "Monroe Doctrine," which historically aimed at U.S. dominance in the Americas [5][6] Critique of European Relations - The report expresses an unprecedented confrontational stance towards Europe, noting a decline in its share of global GDP from 25% in 1990 to 14% today [11] - It raises concerns about the potential for non-European populations to become a majority in some NATO countries, questioning the future of U.S.-European alliances [11] - The strategy criticizes European governments for their handling of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, suggesting they have undermined democratic processes [11][12] Implications for Defense and Military Strategy - The U.S. plans to invest heavily in defense industrial capabilities, including ships, drones, and air defense systems [4] - The strategy indicates a shift towards a more militarized approach to issues in Latin America, framing them as national security concerns [6][9]