“美国战略重大转向”震动欧洲！对欧展示出前所未有的对抗姿态

Core Viewpoint - The new U.S. National Security Strategy marks a significant shift from the long-standing "return to Asia" strategy, emphasizing a focus on limited "core national interests" rather than a broad global dominance, which is deemed unattainable and detrimental to the U.S. middle class and industrial base [1] Group 1: U.S. National Security Strategy - The report indicates that the U.S. will prioritize its homeland and the Western Hemisphere as key national security interests, moving away from idealistic interventions and focusing on practical realism [2] - The strategy suggests a return to "Monroe Doctrine" principles, aiming to expand military presence in Latin America under the guise of addressing security issues like immigration and drug trafficking [4][5] - The report highlights a critical stance towards Europe, noting a decline in its share of global GDP and suggesting potential demographic shifts that could affect NATO alliances [10] Group 2: Military and Defense Implications - The U.S. Defense Secretary emphasized the need for increased military involvement in border patrols and a restoration of military dominance in the Western Hemisphere [2] - There is a call for allies to increase defense spending, reflecting a shift in expectations for international partnerships [2] - The strategy outlines plans for significant investments in defense industrial capabilities, including ships, drones, and air defense systems [2] Group 3: Reactions and Criticism - The strategy has drawn criticism for its perceived return to interventionist policies reminiscent of the Monroe Doctrine, raising concerns about U.S. intentions in Latin America [4][5] - European officials have expressed alarm over the document's tone and content, viewing it as a direct attack on European autonomy and a shift in U.S. foreign policy focus [12] - The report has been linked to rising far-right sentiments in Europe, with implications of racial undertones in its narrative [11]