最高法发布物业服务合同纠纷典型案例

Group 1 - The Supreme People's Court released five typical cases of property service contract disputes to guide local courts in addressing new issues in the property sector and effectively resolving civil disputes, including property service contract disputes [1] - Good property relationships require both property service providers and owners to jointly maintain them, with both parties needing to exercise rights and fulfill obligations according to the law [1] - Courts clarified that property service providers must use reasonable and legal methods to collect property fees and cannot impose excessive restrictions on owners' access to community facilities [1] Group 2 - Owners cannot refuse to pay property fees based on issues not within the property service provider's obligations, such as unreasonable house design, guiding owners to correctly distinguish responsibilities and assert rights [1] - Disputes arising from difficulties in handover after the termination of property service contracts are common, and courts ruled that former service providers cannot demand payment for services after contract termination if they refuse to vacate [1] - The court emphasized the importance of resolving disputes substantively rather than merely adjudicating cases, with local courts exploring innovative mechanisms for multi-faceted resolution of property service disputes [2]