Core Insights - Abbott Laboratories and Eli Lilly reported fundamentally different Q3 earnings, with Abbott showing steady growth driven by medical devices and Lilly experiencing explosive growth from GLP-1 drugs [1] Abbott Laboratories - Abbott's revenue grew by 6.9% year-over-year, primarily supported by its medical device segment, which increased by 14.8% to $5.45 billion [2] - The cardiovascular portfolio, including TriClip and Navitor TAVI, significantly contributed to growth, while the diagnostics segment saw a decline of 6.6% due to reduced COVID testing revenue [2] - Abbott's operating income rose by 13.1% to $2.06 billion, but net income remained flat year-over-year [2] - The company reaffirmed its outlook for 7.5-8.0% organic growth, excluding COVID testing [3] Eli Lilly - Lilly's revenue surged by 54% year-over-year to $17.60 billion, exceeding estimates by 9.5% [3] - The incretin portfolio, particularly Mounjaro and Zepbound, generated significant revenue, with Mounjaro alone contributing $6.52 billion (up 109%) and Zepbound adding $3.57 billion (up 184%) [3] - Net income for Lilly jumped 475% to $5.58 billion, with an operating margin of 48.3%, nearly double that of Abbott [3] - Lilly raised its full-year revenue guidance to $63.0-63.5 billion and non-GAAP EPS to $23.00-23.70 [3] Business Models - Abbott's diversified business model spreads risk across various segments, including medical devices, diagnostics, nutrition, and branded generics, limiting upside but cushioning downside [5] - In contrast, Lilly's concentrated focus on incretin-based therapies has resulted in over $10 billion in quarterly revenue from Mounjaro and Zepbound, but this concentration also creates vulnerability to market fluctuations [6] Future Outlook - For Abbott, the key focus will be on whether the momentum in cardiovascular devices can offset the decline in diagnostics, with the success of TriClip's Japan launch and Navitor's European expansion being critical [7] - For Lilly, effective supply chain execution is essential to meet demand and maintain its market position, especially as it expands manufacturing capacity [8] Risk Profiles - Abbott trades at a P/E ratio of 15.71 with a 1.88% dividend yield, reflecting a mature business model [9] - Lilly, with a P/E ratio of 49.5, indicates high growth expectations tied to its GLP-1 dominance, but this also implies higher concentration risk [9]
Lilly's GLP-1 Surge Dwarfs Abbott's Steady Device Growth With 54% Revenue Jump