Di Yi Cai Jing·2025-12-11 04:58Group 1 - The core idea of the article revolves around the evolution of corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices among foreign enterprises in China, highlighting the shift from compliance to value co-creation in response to local expectations and global standards [2][3][5] - The article discusses the historical context of CSR in China, noting that the 1990s marked a significant turning point for foreign companies as they faced public scrutiny and began to recognize the importance of social responsibility beyond mere compliance [2][3] - It emphasizes the dual embedding of CSR practices, where foreign companies must adhere to international standards while also addressing local development goals such as rural revitalization and green low-carbon initiatives [4][5] Group 2 - Siemens is highlighted as a case study, showcasing its commitment to sustainable development through a comprehensive strategy that integrates digitalization and low-carbon initiatives, aiming to support China's high-quality development goals [7][8][9] - The company has established a sustainable development framework called "DEGREE," focusing on decarbonization, ethics, governance, resource efficiency, and equity, with specific targets for carbon reduction and supply chain collaboration [8][9][10] - Siemens' innovative practices include the establishment of digital factories that enhance energy efficiency and reduce carbon emissions, demonstrating the integration of sustainability into operational processes [10][11] Group 3 - Nestlé's approach to CSR is centered on creating shared value, integrating social responsibility with business growth, and focusing on sustainable agriculture and nutrition [20][21][22] - The company aims to achieve 50% of its core raw materials from regenerative agriculture by 2030, with significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions already achieved [22][23] - Nestlé's supply chain governance has evolved from standard compliance to collaborative empowerment, enhancing the capabilities of farmers and integrating them into the value chain [24][25][26] Group 4 - Procter & Gamble (P&G) is transitioning its corporate responsibility from operational aspects to growth logic, emphasizing the integration of environmental and social issues into long-term competitive advantages [29][30] - The company has set ambitious goals for sustainable packaging, aiming for 100% recyclable or reusable packaging by 2030, aligning with China's green supply chain initiatives [29][30] - P&G's sustainable practices extend to consumer behavior influence and industry collaboration, showcasing a comprehensive approach to responsibility that encompasses production efficiency, consumer choices, and ecological partnerships [31][32][33] Group 5 - Evonik is positioned as a leader in the specialty chemicals sector, focusing on sustainable development through its "next-generation solutions" that contribute significantly to revenue growth [36][37][38] - The company is committed to reducing carbon emissions and enhancing resource efficiency, with specific initiatives in China aimed at aligning with national sustainability goals [36][39][40] - Evonik's innovative practices include the establishment of a sustainability analysis system for product lifecycle assessment, ensuring that sustainability is a core component of product management and decision-making [38][39]