原力数字信披的系列函证存疑，关系到注册制要求的真实、准确、完整的原则问题

Core Viewpoint - Yuanli Digital Technology Co., Ltd. is facing significant scrutiny regarding its revenue recognition practices and financial data reliability as it attempts to list on the Beijing Stock Exchange, raising concerns about compliance with the registration system's requirements for truthful and complete information disclosure [1][2][12]. Group 1: Revenue and Financial Data Concerns - The company reported a revenue increase from 502.85 million yuan in 2022 to 544.88 million yuan in 2024, with a net profit growth from 67.99 million yuan to 82.03 million yuan, indicating a seemingly stable growth trend [2]. - However, discrepancies in revenue confirmation processes have raised serious concerns about the accuracy and reliability of the reported financial data, particularly during the revenue verification phase with clients [3][4]. - Significant differences were noted between the amounts confirmed by clients and those reported by the company, with examples showing discrepancies as high as 51.18 million yuan for the first half of 2025 [3][4]. Group 2: Revenue Recognition Practices - The company has utilized non-traditional methods such as emails and instant messaging for revenue recognition, which has led to questions about the compliance and reliability of these practices [6][7]. - The reliance on electronic verification methods has raised concerns about the internal control measures in place to ensure the validity and security of the revenue recognition process [7][9]. - The company's explanations for revenue discrepancies, primarily citing timing differences in revenue recognition, have been deemed insufficient given the scale and persistence of the discrepancies [4][5]. Group 3: Talent Retention Issues - The company has experienced high employee turnover rates, with rates of 25.00%, 22.44%, 21.47%, and 26.69% over the reporting periods, indicating a significant loss of talent [11]. - The loss of mid-level and junior employees poses risks to project quality and operational efficiency, raising concerns about the company's ability to maintain a stable and skilled workforce [11][12]. - The presence of suppliers established by former employees further complicates the situation, suggesting potential issues with talent retention and the integrity of supplier relationships [11][12].