ZACKS·2025-12-11 17:46Core Insights - Franklin Resources, Inc. (BEN) and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW) are established global asset managers with diverse investment platforms, but their business strategies and competitive positions differ significantly, which may influence future performance [1] Industry Performance - The asset management industry has seen impressive performance in 2025 due to market rebounds, record inflows, and rising global assets under management (AUM), with heightened demand for active management and tactical strategies [2] - Alternatives have remained in high demand as investors seek returns less affected by interest-rate fluctuations, contributing to one of the industry's strongest post-pandemic years [2] 2026 Outlook - The outlook for 2026 is positive, driven by economic growth, declining interest rates, and ongoing product innovation, prompting investors to consider which firm, TROW or BEN, has better potential [3] Franklin Resources (BEN) Overview - Franklin has expanded its platform through acquisitions and partnerships, including a multi-year partnership with Wand AI and the acquisition of Apera Asset Management, adding over $90 billion to global alternative credit AUM [4][5] - The company has seen solid AUM growth, supported by a regionally-focused distribution model and strong inflows across various asset classes [5][6] - As of September 30, 2025, Franklin held $5.6 billion in liquidity with no short-term debt, allowing for strategic capital deployment [7][6] T. Rowe Price (TROW) Overview - T. Rowe Price has strengthened its platform through strategic alliances, including a partnership with Goldman Sachs and the acquisition of Oak Hill Advisors, enhancing its alternative investment offerings [9][10] - The company benefits from diversified AUM across asset classes and geographies, with strong investment-advisory fees supporting revenue growth [10][11] - As of September 30, 2025, TROW held $4.28 billion in liquid assets against total liabilities of $1.15 billion, indicating a robust liquidity position [12] Financial Estimates - For BEN, the fiscal 2026 revenue estimate suggests a decline of 1.7%, while fiscal 2027 indicates growth of 3.5%, with earnings expected to rise by 14.4% in 2026 and 10.9% in 2027 [13] - TROW's sales estimates for 2025 and 2026 suggest increases of 2.9% and 6.2%, respectively, with earnings expected to rise by 4.5% and 5.7% for the same years [15] Stock Performance and Valuation - Over the past year, TROW shares have decreased by 14.3%, while BEN shares have increased by 5.5%, both outperforming the industry average decline of 15.5% [17] - BEN is trading at a forward P/E multiple of 8.98X, while TROW is at 10.08X, both below the industry average of 14.90X, indicating that BEN is currently cheaper than TROW [20] Dividend Performance - Both companies have increased dividends five times in the past five years, with BEN raising its quarterly dividend by 3.2% to 32 cents per share, yielding 5.49%, while TROW increased its dividend by 2.4% to $1.27 per share, yielding 4.91% [22] Comparative Analysis - Both firms are well-managed with diversified investment platforms and solid AUM bases, but BEN has a clearer growth narrative driven by expansion into higher-fee alternatives and strategic acquisitions [25][26] - With a lower valuation and strong growth estimates, BEN appears to offer better upside potential heading into 2026 [27]