银川市原副市长郭柏春案待开庭 曾跨国追逃归案涉多项罪名

Core Viewpoint - The case of Guo Baichun, former deputy mayor of Yinchuan, involves allegations of embezzlement and abuse of power, with significant public interest due to his previous role as a senior executive in a listed company [1][10]. Group 1: Case Background - The investigation into Guo Baichun began in January 2024, with formal proceedings initiated by the Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region Supervisory Commission [3][12]. - Guo was apprehended abroad and returned to China as part of the "Sky Net" operation, which focuses on international corruption cases [3][12]. - The Yinchuan City People's Procuratorate has completed the review and prosecution preparations, awaiting court notification [1][10]. Group 2: Professional Background - Guo Baichun, born in 1965, holds a postdoctoral degree in economics from Renmin University of China and has held various positions in the financial system and local government [4][13]. - He served as the deputy mayor of Yinchuan from June 2013 to October 2018, overseeing finance, state-owned asset supervision, and investment promotion [4][13]. - After leaving public office, he became the chairman of Yara International Investment (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. in January 2020 and held other directorships [4][13]. Group 3: Company Announcements - Yara International issued multiple announcements regarding Guo's legal issues, emphasizing that his actions were personal and unrelated to the company, which continues to operate normally [6][15]. - The company disclosed Guo's investigation status in March 2024 and subsequent updates regarding his criminal detention and arrest in 2025 [6][15]. Group 4: Allegations and Charges - Guo is accused of embezzling public funds and abusing his power during his tenure as deputy mayor, with specific incidents involving loans to private companies [7][16]. - In 2016, he facilitated a loan of 46 million to a private company for stock trading, with subsequent transfers to personal accounts [7][16]. - He also directed a state-owned company to lend 500 million to private company executives, which was repaid only after multiple extensions [7][16]. - The abuse of power allegations include using public authority to target competitors, including fabricating criminal charges against them [7][16].